Serveur d'exploration sur Mozart

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Mozart effect-Shmozart effect: A meta-analysis

Identifieur interne : 000080 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000079; suivant : 000081

Mozart effect-Shmozart effect: A meta-analysis

Auteurs : Jakob Pietschnig ; Martin Voracek ; Anton K. Formann

Source :

RBID : Francis:10-0284529

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

The transient enhancement of performance on spatial tasks in standardized tests after exposure to the first movement "allegro con spirito" of the Mozart sonata for two pianos in D major (KV 448) is referred to as the Mozart effect since its first observation by Rauscher, Shaw, and Ky (1993). These findings turned out to be amazingly hard to replicate, thus leading to an abundance of conflicting results. Sixteen years after initial publication we conduct the so far largest, most comprehensive, and up-to-date meta-analysis (nearly 40 studies, over 3000 subjects), including a diversity of unpublished research papers to finally clarify the scientific record about whether or not a specific Mozart effect exists. We could show that the overall estimated effect is small in size (d=0.37, 95% CI [0.23, 0.52]) for samples exposed to the Mozart sonata KV 448 and samples that had been exposed to a non-musical stimulus or no stimulus at all preceding spatial task performance. Additionally, calculation of effect sizes for samples exposed to any other musical stimulus and samples exposed to a non-musical stimulus or no stimulus at all yielded effects similar in strength (d=0.38, 95% CI [0.13, 0.63]), whereas there was a negligible effect between the two music conditions (d=0.15, 95% CI [0.02, 0.28]). Furthermore, formal tests yielded evidence for confounding publication bias, requiring downward correction of effects. The central finding of the present paper however, is certainly the noticeably higher overall effect in studies performed by Rauscher and colleagues than in studies performed by other researchers, indicating systematically moderating effects of lab affiliation. On the whole, there is little evidence left for a specific, performance-enhancing Mozart effect.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0160-2896
A02 01      @0 NTLLDT
A03   1    @0 Intelligence : (Norwood)
A05       @2 38
A06       @2 3
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Mozart effect-Shmozart effect: A meta-analysis
A11 01  1    @1 PIETSCHNIG (Jakob)
A11 02  1    @1 VORACEK (Martin)
A11 03  1    @1 FORMANN (Anton K.)
A14 01      @1 University of Vienna, Faculty of Psychology @3 AUT @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut.
A20       @1 314-323
A21       @1 2010
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 18063 @5 354000192996360030
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2010 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 1 p.1/4
A47 01  1    @0 10-0284529
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Intelligence : (Norwood)
A66 01      @0 NLD
C01 01    ENG  @0 The transient enhancement of performance on spatial tasks in standardized tests after exposure to the first movement "allegro con spirito" of the Mozart sonata for two pianos in D major (KV 448) is referred to as the Mozart effect since its first observation by Rauscher, Shaw, and Ky (1993). These findings turned out to be amazingly hard to replicate, thus leading to an abundance of conflicting results. Sixteen years after initial publication we conduct the so far largest, most comprehensive, and up-to-date meta-analysis (nearly 40 studies, over 3000 subjects), including a diversity of unpublished research papers to finally clarify the scientific record about whether or not a specific Mozart effect exists. We could show that the overall estimated effect is small in size (d=0.37, 95% CI [0.23, 0.52]) for samples exposed to the Mozart sonata KV 448 and samples that had been exposed to a non-musical stimulus or no stimulus at all preceding spatial task performance. Additionally, calculation of effect sizes for samples exposed to any other musical stimulus and samples exposed to a non-musical stimulus or no stimulus at all yielded effects similar in strength (d=0.38, 95% CI [0.13, 0.63]), whereas there was a negligible effect between the two music conditions (d=0.15, 95% CI [0.02, 0.28]). Furthermore, formal tests yielded evidence for confounding publication bias, requiring downward correction of effects. The central finding of the present paper however, is certainly the noticeably higher overall effect in studies performed by Rauscher and colleagues than in studies performed by other researchers, indicating systematically moderating effects of lab affiliation. On the whole, there is little evidence left for a specific, performance-enhancing Mozart effect.
C02 01  X    @0 770B08F @1 II
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Métaanalyse @5 01
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Metaanalysis @5 01
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Meta-análisis @5 01
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Article synthèse @5 02
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Review @5 02
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Artículo síntesis @5 02
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Aptitude spatiale @5 03
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 Spatial ability @5 03
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Aptitude espacial @5 03
C03 04  X  FRE  @0 Aptitude intellectuelle @5 04
C03 04  X  ENG  @0 Intellectual ability @5 04
C03 04  X  SPA  @0 Aptitud intelectual @5 04
C03 05  X  FRE  @0 Musique @5 05
C03 05  X  ENG  @0 Music @5 05
C03 05  X  SPA  @0 Música @5 05
C03 06  X  FRE  @0 Effet psychologique @5 06
C03 06  X  ENG  @0 Psychological effect @5 06
C03 06  X  SPA  @0 Efecto psicológico @5 06
C03 07  X  FRE  @0 Homme @5 18
C03 07  X  ENG  @0 Human @5 18
C03 07  X  SPA  @0 Hombre @5 18
C03 08  X  FRE  @0 Effet Mozart @4 INC @5 86
C07 01  X  FRE  @0 Cognition @5 37
C07 01  X  ENG  @0 Cognition @5 37
C07 01  X  SPA  @0 Cognición @5 37
N21       @1 186

Format Inist (serveur)

NO : FRANCIS 10-0284529 INIST
ET : Mozart effect-Shmozart effect: A meta-analysis
AU : PIETSCHNIG (Jakob); VORACEK (Martin); FORMANN (Anton K.)
AF : University of Vienna, Faculty of Psychology/Autriche (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut.)
DT : Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO : Intelligence : (Norwood); ISSN 0160-2896; Coden NTLLDT; Pays-Bas; Da. 2010; Vol. 38; No. 3; Pp. 314-323; Bibl. 1 p.1/4
LA : Anglais
EA : The transient enhancement of performance on spatial tasks in standardized tests after exposure to the first movement "allegro con spirito" of the Mozart sonata for two pianos in D major (KV 448) is referred to as the Mozart effect since its first observation by Rauscher, Shaw, and Ky (1993). These findings turned out to be amazingly hard to replicate, thus leading to an abundance of conflicting results. Sixteen years after initial publication we conduct the so far largest, most comprehensive, and up-to-date meta-analysis (nearly 40 studies, over 3000 subjects), including a diversity of unpublished research papers to finally clarify the scientific record about whether or not a specific Mozart effect exists. We could show that the overall estimated effect is small in size (d=0.37, 95% CI [0.23, 0.52]) for samples exposed to the Mozart sonata KV 448 and samples that had been exposed to a non-musical stimulus or no stimulus at all preceding spatial task performance. Additionally, calculation of effect sizes for samples exposed to any other musical stimulus and samples exposed to a non-musical stimulus or no stimulus at all yielded effects similar in strength (d=0.38, 95% CI [0.13, 0.63]), whereas there was a negligible effect between the two music conditions (d=0.15, 95% CI [0.02, 0.28]). Furthermore, formal tests yielded evidence for confounding publication bias, requiring downward correction of effects. The central finding of the present paper however, is certainly the noticeably higher overall effect in studies performed by Rauscher and colleagues than in studies performed by other researchers, indicating systematically moderating effects of lab affiliation. On the whole, there is little evidence left for a specific, performance-enhancing Mozart effect.
CC : 770B08F
FD : Métaanalyse; Article synthèse; Aptitude spatiale; Aptitude intellectuelle; Musique; Effet psychologique; Homme; Effet Mozart
FG : Cognition
ED : Metaanalysis; Review; Spatial ability; Intellectual ability; Music; Psychological effect; Human
EG : Cognition
SD : Meta-análisis; Artículo síntesis; Aptitude espacial; Aptitud intelectual; Música; Efecto psicológico; Hombre
LO : INIST-18063.354000192996360030
ID : 10-0284529

Links to Exploration step

Francis:10-0284529

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Mozart effect-Shmozart effect: A meta-analysis</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pietschnig, Jakob" sort="Pietschnig, Jakob" uniqKey="Pietschnig J" first="Jakob" last="Pietschnig">Jakob Pietschnig</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>University of Vienna, Faculty of Psychology</s1>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Voracek, Martin" sort="Voracek, Martin" uniqKey="Voracek M" first="Martin" last="Voracek">Martin Voracek</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>University of Vienna, Faculty of Psychology</s1>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Formann, Anton K" sort="Formann, Anton K" uniqKey="Formann A" first="Anton K." last="Formann">Anton K. Formann</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>University of Vienna, Faculty of Psychology</s1>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">10-0284529</idno>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 10-0284529 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Francis:10-0284529</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000080</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Mozart effect-Shmozart effect: A meta-analysis</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pietschnig, Jakob" sort="Pietschnig, Jakob" uniqKey="Pietschnig J" first="Jakob" last="Pietschnig">Jakob Pietschnig</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>University of Vienna, Faculty of Psychology</s1>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Voracek, Martin" sort="Voracek, Martin" uniqKey="Voracek M" first="Martin" last="Voracek">Martin Voracek</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>University of Vienna, Faculty of Psychology</s1>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Formann, Anton K" sort="Formann, Anton K" uniqKey="Formann A" first="Anton K." last="Formann">Anton K. Formann</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>University of Vienna, Faculty of Psychology</s1>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Intelligence : (Norwood)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Intelligence : (Norwood)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0160-2896</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Intelligence : (Norwood)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Intelligence : (Norwood)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0160-2896</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Human</term>
<term>Intellectual ability</term>
<term>Metaanalysis</term>
<term>Music</term>
<term>Psychological effect</term>
<term>Review</term>
<term>Spatial ability</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Métaanalyse</term>
<term>Article synthèse</term>
<term>Aptitude spatiale</term>
<term>Aptitude intellectuelle</term>
<term>Musique</term>
<term>Effet psychologique</term>
<term>Homme</term>
<term>Effet Mozart</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The transient enhancement of performance on spatial tasks in standardized tests after exposure to the first movement "allegro con spirito" of the Mozart sonata for two pianos in D major (KV 448) is referred to as the Mozart effect since its first observation by Rauscher, Shaw, and Ky (1993). These findings turned out to be amazingly hard to replicate, thus leading to an abundance of conflicting results. Sixteen years after initial publication we conduct the so far largest, most comprehensive, and up-to-date meta-analysis (nearly 40 studies, over 3000 subjects), including a diversity of unpublished research papers to finally clarify the scientific record about whether or not a specific Mozart effect exists. We could show that the overall estimated effect is small in size (d=0.37, 95% CI [0.23, 0.52]) for samples exposed to the Mozart sonata KV 448 and samples that had been exposed to a non-musical stimulus or no stimulus at all preceding spatial task performance. Additionally, calculation of effect sizes for samples exposed to any other musical stimulus and samples exposed to a non-musical stimulus or no stimulus at all yielded effects similar in strength (d=0.38, 95% CI [0.13, 0.63]), whereas there was a negligible effect between the two music conditions (d=0.15, 95% CI [0.02, 0.28]). Furthermore, formal tests yielded evidence for confounding publication bias, requiring downward correction of effects. The central finding of the present paper however, is certainly the noticeably higher overall effect in studies performed by Rauscher and colleagues than in studies performed by other researchers, indicating systematically moderating effects of lab affiliation. On the whole, there is little evidence left for a specific, performance-enhancing Mozart effect.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0160-2896</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01">
<s0>NTLLDT</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>Intelligence : (Norwood)</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>38</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>3</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Mozart effect-Shmozart effect: A meta-analysis</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>PIETSCHNIG (Jakob)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>VORACEK (Martin)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1">
<s1>FORMANN (Anton K.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>University of Vienna, Faculty of Psychology</s1>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>314-323</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2010</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>18063</s2>
<s5>354000192996360030</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2010 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>1 p.1/4</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>10-0284529</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Intelligence : (Norwood)</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>NLD</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>The transient enhancement of performance on spatial tasks in standardized tests after exposure to the first movement "allegro con spirito" of the Mozart sonata for two pianos in D major (KV 448) is referred to as the Mozart effect since its first observation by Rauscher, Shaw, and Ky (1993). These findings turned out to be amazingly hard to replicate, thus leading to an abundance of conflicting results. Sixteen years after initial publication we conduct the so far largest, most comprehensive, and up-to-date meta-analysis (nearly 40 studies, over 3000 subjects), including a diversity of unpublished research papers to finally clarify the scientific record about whether or not a specific Mozart effect exists. We could show that the overall estimated effect is small in size (d=0.37, 95% CI [0.23, 0.52]) for samples exposed to the Mozart sonata KV 448 and samples that had been exposed to a non-musical stimulus or no stimulus at all preceding spatial task performance. Additionally, calculation of effect sizes for samples exposed to any other musical stimulus and samples exposed to a non-musical stimulus or no stimulus at all yielded effects similar in strength (d=0.38, 95% CI [0.13, 0.63]), whereas there was a negligible effect between the two music conditions (d=0.15, 95% CI [0.02, 0.28]). Furthermore, formal tests yielded evidence for confounding publication bias, requiring downward correction of effects. The central finding of the present paper however, is certainly the noticeably higher overall effect in studies performed by Rauscher and colleagues than in studies performed by other researchers, indicating systematically moderating effects of lab affiliation. On the whole, there is little evidence left for a specific, performance-enhancing Mozart effect.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>770B08F</s0>
<s1>II</s1>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Métaanalyse</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Metaanalysis</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Meta-análisis</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Article synthèse</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Review</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Artículo síntesis</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Aptitude spatiale</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Spatial ability</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Aptitude espacial</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Aptitude intellectuelle</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Intellectual ability</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Aptitud intelectual</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Musique</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Music</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Música</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Effet psychologique</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Psychological effect</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Efecto psicológico</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Human</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Effet Mozart</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>86</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Cognición</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21>
<s1>186</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server>
<NO>FRANCIS 10-0284529 INIST</NO>
<ET>Mozart effect-Shmozart effect: A meta-analysis</ET>
<AU>PIETSCHNIG (Jakob); VORACEK (Martin); FORMANN (Anton K.)</AU>
<AF>University of Vienna, Faculty of Psychology/Autriche (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Intelligence : (Norwood); ISSN 0160-2896; Coden NTLLDT; Pays-Bas; Da. 2010; Vol. 38; No. 3; Pp. 314-323; Bibl. 1 p.1/4</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>The transient enhancement of performance on spatial tasks in standardized tests after exposure to the first movement "allegro con spirito" of the Mozart sonata for two pianos in D major (KV 448) is referred to as the Mozart effect since its first observation by Rauscher, Shaw, and Ky (1993). These findings turned out to be amazingly hard to replicate, thus leading to an abundance of conflicting results. Sixteen years after initial publication we conduct the so far largest, most comprehensive, and up-to-date meta-analysis (nearly 40 studies, over 3000 subjects), including a diversity of unpublished research papers to finally clarify the scientific record about whether or not a specific Mozart effect exists. We could show that the overall estimated effect is small in size (d=0.37, 95% CI [0.23, 0.52]) for samples exposed to the Mozart sonata KV 448 and samples that had been exposed to a non-musical stimulus or no stimulus at all preceding spatial task performance. Additionally, calculation of effect sizes for samples exposed to any other musical stimulus and samples exposed to a non-musical stimulus or no stimulus at all yielded effects similar in strength (d=0.38, 95% CI [0.13, 0.63]), whereas there was a negligible effect between the two music conditions (d=0.15, 95% CI [0.02, 0.28]). Furthermore, formal tests yielded evidence for confounding publication bias, requiring downward correction of effects. The central finding of the present paper however, is certainly the noticeably higher overall effect in studies performed by Rauscher and colleagues than in studies performed by other researchers, indicating systematically moderating effects of lab affiliation. On the whole, there is little evidence left for a specific, performance-enhancing Mozart effect.</EA>
<CC>770B08F</CC>
<FD>Métaanalyse; Article synthèse; Aptitude spatiale; Aptitude intellectuelle; Musique; Effet psychologique; Homme; Effet Mozart</FD>
<FG>Cognition</FG>
<ED>Metaanalysis; Review; Spatial ability; Intellectual ability; Music; Psychological effect; Human</ED>
<EG>Cognition</EG>
<SD>Meta-análisis; Artículo síntesis; Aptitude espacial; Aptitud intelectual; Música; Efecto psicológico; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-18063.354000192996360030</LO>
<ID>10-0284529</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/MozartV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000080 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000080 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Musique
   |area=    MozartV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Francis:10-0284529
   |texte=   Mozart effect-Shmozart effect: A meta-analysis
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.20.
Data generation: Sun Apr 10 15:06:14 2016. Site generation: Tue Feb 7 15:40:35 2023